I would do a more detailed analysis but the TL;DR is just IMT is better on more maps and more solid as a team. That's it really. 2-0 IMT
ACS | K | D | A | +/– | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
285 | 24 | /22/ | 6 | +2 | 170.0 | 26% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |
![]() |
237 | 20 | /19/ | 9 | +1 | 148.5 | 31% | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
![]() |
223 | 16 | /17/ | 16 | -1 | 133.1 | 26% | 0 | 3 | -3 | |
![]() |
203 | 16 | /21/ | 2 | -5 | 120.2 | 13% | 3 | 8 | -5 | |
![]() |
144 | 13 | /17/ | 6 | -4 | 95.3 | 24% | 1 | 0 | +1 |
ACS | K | D | A | +/– | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() |
249 | 41 | /39/ | 21 | +2 | 156.8 | 21% | 2 | 6 | -4 | |
![]() ![]() |
244 | 40 | /38/ | 13 | +2 | 136.5 | 26% | 10 | 8 | +2 | |
![]() ![]() |
231 | 38 | /36/ | 10 | +2 | 150.7 | 14% | 4 | 9 | -5 | |
![]() ![]() |
205 | 32 | /33/ | 24 | -1 | 132.2 | 27% | 2 | 4 | -2 | |
![]() ![]() |
176 | 26 | /33/ | 16 | -7 | 132.1 | 24% | 2 | 1 | +1 |
ACS | K | D | A | +/– | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
258 | 22 | /15/ | 8 | +7 | 181.2 | 15% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
![]() |
251 | 20 | /19/ | 4 | +1 | 124.6 | 20% | 7 | 5 | +2 | |
![]() |
212 | 17 | /17/ | 15 | 0 | 143.5 | 17% | 0 | 5 | -5 | |
![]() |
208 | 13 | /16/ | 10 | -3 | 168.9 | 24% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
![]() |
187 | 16 | /16/ | 8 | 0 | 131.3 | 28% | 2 | 1 | +1 |
nah im talking about old ABX. back with POACH, yay, ANDROID. on paper, that should have been a stacked roster, but I guess either bad IGLing or coaching or chemistry restricted its potential. Also, I would love to see yay go to NRG. They would have a lot of firepower, and if they come up with the right strats, could possibly contend for masters. edit: meant to reply to the above comment lol