have you applied the context of the roster/coaching woes they've had since challengers 1? or is that not good enough for your dumbass narrative
1
100T not making any changes
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
I could understand what you mean, maybe my assessment of why Sentinel fell off could be flawed, but even if this assessment is incorrect, the proof that 100 thieves were able to go in champions with stellar as an igl should be evidence enough that he is a good igl, not to mention that 100 thieves did beat sentinel to get there. Once again, I don't have a dumbass narrative, I only provide analysis on what I see and why I think stellar is potentially a better igl than stellar. Also I dont know why you think I have narratives (especially hate ones), but I based everything on what I see (in short: stats and performance) and it is with this that I form my opinion on.
what did stellar do before getting picked up on the sean gares led 100T? that's all you need to check to discern their quality as players. Once shahzam actually got proper backing and a month long bootcamp they rivaled 100T and gave them their hardest series in the LCQ, it's pretty obvious that the dude is just purely better
also just saying, but people can improve, just because someone hasn't produced some amazing result in the past doesn't mean they aren't good in the present/future. 100t prove this by turning some players not a lot of people thought were good and made them a strong team, and stellar is no exception. (Some people consider Will a tier 2 player yet when he was on the big stage, he was a lan animal and producing great stats.) Everyone has potential.
Discord