42

Keznit racism in CS

Comments:
Threaded Linear
← View full thread
#111
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

I have already explained to you why your logic is flawed and you keep regurgitating the same stuff. Word of mouth is not proof, never has been. Also you do not know what a testimony is, it is given under oath. Nobody ever mentioned any legal repercussions so I don’t know why you think you did something with that either. Keep on going in the echo chamber bro 👍🏾 I can’t debate with someone who doesn’t even attempt to understand both perspectives. Things have never worked like how you’re trying to put it, I find your ignorance pathetic.

#112
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

Testimony is given about an oath in a court. But we're not in a court. So I will continue to believe in the words of Pleets and other former CS:GO players, no matter what you say.

Just reminding you what Pleets said, and keznit NEVER denied it:

"Manito I played with him every day at ESEA and he was racist SEVERAL TIMES, I wouldn't be saying that here without being sure what I heard." https://twitter.com/pleetsfps/status/1323082966025838594

#113
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

I don’t even think you know what you’re trying to say to me at this point. Before you said you use these testimonies, now you say you won’t use them after you google searched what a testimony really is lol. I think I’m done trying to talk to you, I “believe” you are a dumbass lol.

#114
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

Your interpretation is pretty bad for a native, and you didn't understand what I said.

You're done talking to me because you have nothing to say, simple. I sent the tweet from Pleets, and you can't answer that

#115
giantnutsack12345
4
Frags
+

You must be dense. Word of mouth is not proof. I have said this five times now, and somehow you do not get it. It’s not about what you “believe” if you have no sufficient proof backing it up. It really is simple. If you think tweets from players saying he is racist is sufficient proof, you’re a dumbass. Use your brain. And just to clarify, I’m not saying Keznit is NOT racist, I think it is up in the air. Innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

#116
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

Bro, when are you going to understand that racism is so recurrent by Chileans and Argentines in CS:GO, that no one cares to record it for proof anymore? Pleets tweet is more than enough for the simple fact that KEZNIT NEVER DENY OR COMMENT IT. He has commented on several other cases, but NEVER talked about it. If you can't understand it now, I'm sorry to say, but your IQ is the same of a capybara.

#117
giantnutsack12345
2
Frags
+

And how would your opinion change if keznit denied, or commented on it? It probably wouldn't, because you are looking to blame him already. We really live in an age where people think a tweet is sufficient evidence that something happened rather than a recording/log. You definitely have th brains of a bronze player thats for sure. I understand what you're saying but it literally does not matter when you look at this objectively. Use your brain jfk. You the type to fall for a clickhole article lmfao.

#122
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

It wouldn't change my mind entirely, but I would give him the benefit of the doubt. But as he has never denied these statements, and it has been 2 years, there is no doubt. He "counter-argued" (idk if this word exists in english too) all the other polemics, but he NEVER commented on this one.

#124
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

Innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. You mfs are really going around being like “oH hE didNt DenY this tweEt BuT hE deniEd alL tHe OthEr oneS sO it MUsT bE GuiLty.” That’s something called witchhunting because you are acting like a tweet that he didn’t deny is proof. Like that’s legit how they found people guilty in medieval Europe lmfaooo. Bring a recording or chat log instead and we will believe you. Simple as that.

#126
BronzilianYoru
-1
Frags
+

Innocent until proven guilty. But if you don't defend yourself from a lawsuit in court for 2 years, you will definitely be judged as guilty lol. You're so dumb.

#127
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

It’s not a lawsuit? It’s a rumor??? Are you retarded?

#128
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

You don't know what an analogy is. You are definitely dumb.

#130
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

The analogy doesn’t work. One is a lawsuit the other is a rumor. They cannot compare when judging someone as guilty. You must be stupid.

#131
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

yes, it works. Because that's how a analogy works hahahaha

you definitely don't know what a analogy is.

#118
giantnutsack12345
0
Frags
+

Let me say it for the 7th time. Word of mouth is not proof.

#121
BronzilianYoru
0
Frags
+

It's. That's why testimony exists.

#123
giantnutsack12345
0
Frags
+

A testimony is a legal evidence given under oath in court. And it is never used as sole evidence, only to back up substantial proof. Go to any court in the world, nobody will get convicted just because people SAID they did something. Please learn how the world works before speaking out your ass.

#125
BronzilianYoru
-1
Frags
+

Testimony was an example I gave that words serve as evidence.

I don't know if you know but no one has sued him in court so you don't need any oath to accuse him of something lol. Again, he NEVER defended himself from it. He never even commented.

#129
giantnutsack12345
0
Frags
+

Word of mouth is not evidence bro. How do you still not understand. Him not denying something is also not evidence lol. These are not forms of proof. You could make the same argument if he denied the rumors, as “oh he has something to hide!” It’s just pure speculation, coming out from the same train of thought. They are not evidence, never have been.

#133
BronzilianYoru
-1
Frags
+

Word of mouth is a evidence. That's why testimony exists. Word of mouth is a evidence. That's why KEZNIT NEVER DENY OR COMMENT IT. He has commented on several other cases, but NEVER talked about it.

#134
giantnutsack12345
1
Frags
+

Holy braindead, testimony is taken under oath, in SUPPORT OF OTHER EVIDENCE. Not the sole evidence. Player tweets are not supporting chat logs or recordings, and not taken under oath. Stop talking about testimonies when you do not know what you are talking about. Word of mouth by itself is not evidence. You are purely speculating and proving my point.

#136
BronzilianYoru
-1
Frags
+

There's no way that you are so dumb that you cannot understand such simple sentences.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
This thread has been locked.