G2-1 Sentinels
14-12
11-13
18-16
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.18 1.91 3.02 | 376 335 502 | 23 15 8 | / 5 4 1 / | 4 3 1 | +18 +11 +7 | 94% 92% 100% | 233 217 283 | 26% 29% 21% | 5 3 2 | 0 0 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.57 1.67 1.27 | 315 327 280 | 17 13 4 | / 8 5 3 / | 4 3 1 | +9 +8 +1 | 88% 83% 100% | 195 203 170 | 21% 22% 18% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.30 1.26 1.43 | 149 166 98 | 11 9 2 | / 5 4 1 / | 9 5 4 | +6 +5 +1 | 81% 75% 100% | 91 109 40 | 23% 23% 20% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.05 1.06 1.03 | 211 196 259 | 11 8 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 8 3 5 | +1 +1 0 | 69% 58% 100% | 150 136 192 | 13% 14% 13% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.96 0.94 1.03 | 172 164 198 | 10 7 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 8 6 2 | 0 0 0 | 75% 75% 75% | 110 106 123 | 13% 6% 33% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.87 1.28 0.73 | 219 317 187 | 11 4 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 2 2 0 | -3 0 -3 | 56% 100% 42% | 125 198 100 | 11% 16% 6% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.80 0.58 0.87 | 201 203 201 | 10 3 7 | / 14 4 10 / | 3 0 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 50% 25% 58% | 140 143 139 | 21% 40% 17% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.68 0.53 0.73 | 174 166 177 | 9 2 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 5 2 3 | -6 -2 -4 | 63% 75% 58% | 115 115 115 | 34% 33% 35% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.47 0.02 0.65 | 147 87 168 | 7 1 6 | / 14 4 10 / | 0 0 0 | -7 -3 -4 | 38% 25% 42% | 86 50 98 | 25% 50% 20% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.23 0.35 0.19 | 59 89 50 | 1 1 0 | / 15 4 11 / | 5 2 3 | -14 -3 -11 | 38% 100% 17% | 52 58 50 | 10% 17% 7% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.80 1.11 1.52 | 301 357 179 | 42 31 11 | / 22 14 8 / | 7 6 1 | +20 +17 +3 | 78% 83% 69% | 189 243 107 | 24% 29% 15% | 9 7 2 | 2 0 2 | +7 +7 0 | |
|
1.37 1.48 1.41 | 272 267 258 | 37 22 15 | / 20 13 7 / | 11 6 5 | +17 +9 +8 | 80% 79% 81% | 169 170 167 | 24% 24% 24% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.22 1.68 1.40 | 217 213 257 | 37 20 17 | / 21 14 7 / | 15 8 7 | +16 +6 +10 | 85% 79% 94% | 148 146 150 | 27% 30% 24% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.75 1.37 1.00 | 224 165 321 | 28 12 16 | / 29 17 12 / | 17 7 10 | -1 -5 +4 | 75% 67% 88% | 164 128 217 | 16% 15% 17% | 7 3 4 | 7 4 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.74 1.09 0.88 | 160 145 178 | 22 12 10 | / 26 17 9 / | 13 9 4 | -4 -5 +1 | 80% 75% 88% | 109 96 128 | 17% 13% 21% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.76 1.01 0.91 | 184 198 187 | 25 9 16 | / 30 13 17 / | 4 2 2 | -5 -4 -1 | 65% 63% 67% | 123 120 126 | 23% 19% 28% | 4 3 1 | 3 1 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.76 0.80 0.79 | 205 202 208 | 27 11 16 | / 36 15 21 / | 8 3 5 | -9 -4 -5 | 58% 44% 67% | 135 134 136 | 19% 19% 19% | 1 0 1 | 8 4 4 | -7 -4 -3 | |
|
0.77 0.79 0.78 | 198 169 211 | 25 9 16 | / 33 13 20 / | 4 2 2 | -8 -4 -4 | 53% 56% 50% | 120 110 126 | 14% 13% 16% | 4 2 2 | 3 0 3 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.61 0.88 0.77 | 196 156 229 | 27 8 19 | / 35 14 21 / | 14 8 6 | -8 -6 -2 | 58% 56% 58% | 133 108 149 | 24% 19% 27% | 6 3 3 | 7 2 5 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.49 0.78 0.66 | 107 110 121 | 14 6 8 | / 32 14 18 / | 14 5 9 | -18 -8 -10 | 63% 81% 50% | 84 73 92 | 12% 11% 12% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.18 1.76 | 285 260 311 | 26 11 15 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 3 3 | +10 +1 +9 | 88% 83% 92% | 185 184 187 | 30% 37% 24% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.31 1.06 1.55 | 228 206 250 | 20 9 11 | / 12 8 4 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +1 +7 | 75% 75% 75% | 152 138 166 | 27% 26% 28% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.08 1.70 0.47 | 225 379 71 | 19 16 3 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 3 0 | +2 +6 -4 | 67% 75% 58% | 159 269 48 | 22% 28% 7% | 4 4 0 | 2 0 2 | +2 +4 -2 | |
|
0.97 0.45 1.49 | 237 134 341 | 17 4 13 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 4 5 | -2 -6 +4 | 79% 75% 83% | 173 120 225 | 18% 16% 19% | 5 1 4 | 6 4 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.82 0.54 1.11 | 148 125 172 | 12 5 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -5 +1 | 83% 75% 92% | 108 86 130 | 19% 22% 18% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 1.01 1.38 | 221 235 207 | 18 8 10 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | +2 -1 +3 | 83% 75% 92% | 148 144 153 | 23% 16% 37% | 3 3 0 | 1 0 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.95 0.54 1.36 | 155 118 193 | 13 5 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 9 3 6 | -4 -5 +1 | 79% 75% 83% | 106 78 134 | 12% 9% 14% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.83 0.64 1.03 | 217 153 281 | 18 6 12 | / 20 10 10 / | 9 6 3 | -2 -4 +2 | 54% 50% 58% | 145 106 184 | 19% 12% 24% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.78 0.82 0.74 | 208 201 216 | 17 8 9 | / 22 11 11 / | 5 3 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 63% 50% 75% | 132 132 132 | 18% 16% 21% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.72 0.59 0.85 | 177 120 236 | 14 5 9 | / 19 9 10 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -4 -1 | 50% 42% 58% | 117 80 153 | 17% 10% 22% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 |
just because u hate G2 and mixwell for some reason i cant understand, doesnt mean they have to lose, thats what u want, not necessary what should or would happen. Now mixwell and G2 have proven u are wrong, as we already all know, u just predicting what u would love to happen, thats not a prediction, thats your best wishes
would wait till SEN actually get knocked out to start making the judgement. SEN showed time and time again they can turn it up when things matter, they already qualified for playoff pretty much. Will see how they do in playoff first. Not to mention they will be avoiding GMB if they are 2nd seed which could actually work out in their favour
Because it doesn't matter if they avoid gambit, sen is never winning berlin anyways, they can try whatever they want but other teams are a level higher than them, they are already figured out lol, these players aren't talents (except for tenz) they will fall off hard (like they already are) and then will get replaced by younger talents
based on what? Don't forget after Berlin, they cleaned up Envy and 100T, 2of the stronger teams in Berlin.
Now after a lost you ready to write them off? How about GMB losing to 100T? Have teams already figured out GMB? Using a BO3 lost to rule out a team is ridiculous, when they have won every single one till now.
I agree SEN is not as invincible as in Iceland, but no teams are currently. SEN is still the one to beat. Until the moment they get knocked out, they are still favourite in my book.
Great game by G2. Granted I expected a 2-0 by SEN, but damn G2 really did show up today, everyone was on point today, nukkye and AvOvA especially.
Now look, I am from NA and I am not on that seeding game COPIUM. Every match is important. Sure it is gimmicky to say that, but that SEN outcome would've made the difference in facing ACEND, KRU/VK, and Gambit, rather than VS and their NA brethren. Every team is preparing for SEN, of course they are the world champions currently.
Also it's too early to say that the SEN era is over, because there necessarily haven't been an era yet, and no, this loss doesn't make SEN shit, they are exploitable just like every other team. Simple logic: one team wins, one team loses, and today: G2 won and SEN lost.
Always good to see rational humans exist.
I was rooting for G2 all the way, but Sen played well on map 2, and honestly, anyone who isn't completely shit at this game, knows how impossibly difficult it is to have a consistent result. G2 earned this W, but let's not get carried away, SEN are still them GUYS.
Acho que a Sentinels guardou estratégia, eles não mudaram nada desde o primeiro jogo contra a G2. Sei lá, isso não me entra na cabeça, como um time campeão que está sempre tentando superar adversários não se inova? Confiança elevada?? Talvez eles tenham feito esse jogo apenas pra testar como a G2 jogaria, elevando eles ao máximo pra revelar as propostas de jogo... isso só os próximos confrontos dirão. Mas uma coisa eu tenho certeza, a Sentinels não é boba, eles não jogariam esse jogo contra a G2 da mesma maneira se ainda valesse a vaga, ou sim e eles estão tremendamente confiantes e com ego elevado e estou errado.
I think Sentinels kept their strategy, they haven't changed anything since the first games with the G2. I don't know, that doesn't enter my head, how does a champion team that is always trying to overcome opponents not innovate? High confidence?? Maybe they made this game just to test how the G2 would play, pushing them to the max to reveal the game's proposals... that's only the next confrontations will tell. But one thing I'm sure Sentinels isn't silly, they wouldn't play this game against G2 the same way if it was still worth the spot, or yes and they're tremendously confident and high ego and I'm wrong - is the translation if u guys wonder