SEN vs V1 every region is trash
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.25 1.59 0.91 | 175 211 140 | 16 10 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 12 7 5 | +2 +4 -2 | 85% 92% 77% | 121 137 104 | 16% 15% 19% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.17 1.10 1.24 | 259 250 268 | 23 11 12 | / 20 10 10 / | 14 7 7 | +3 +1 +2 | 85% 85% 85% | 172 173 172 | 18% 22% 15% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.06 1.09 1.04 | 268 250 286 | 24 13 11 | / 22 9 13 / | 8 4 4 | +2 +4 -2 | 77% 85% 69% | 163 168 157 | 18% 19% 16% | 5 3 2 | 1 0 1 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.03 1.09 0.97 | 258 268 250 | 25 13 12 | / 23 11 12 / | 5 4 1 | +2 +2 0 | 69% 77% 62% | 142 150 134 | 21% 9% 37% | 6 3 3 | 5 5 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
1.00 1.08 0.92 | 163 175 151 | 15 8 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 10 8 2 | -1 0 -1 | 81% 85% 77% | 113 144 82 | 19% 26% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 0.86 1.54 | 267 203 332 | 24 8 16 | / 20 10 10 / | 8 7 1 | +4 -2 +6 | 81% 85% 77% | 163 136 191 | 27% 24% 29% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.46 0.64 | 233 285 182 | 21 14 7 | / 22 10 12 / | 7 3 4 | -1 +4 -5 | 77% 77% 77% | 161 186 137 | 29% 40% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.96 1.18 0.74 | 216 253 180 | 20 13 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 7 6 1 | +2 +5 -3 | 69% 77% 62% | 136 156 116 | 33% 33% 32% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.92 0.76 | 203 209 199 | 19 10 9 | / 21 10 11 / | 3 2 1 | -2 0 -2 | 50% 62% 38% | 138 132 143 | 25% 31% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.44 0.41 0.47 | 126 148 106 | 10 6 4 | / 22 11 11 / | 4 2 2 | -12 -5 -7 | 65% 69% 62% | 72 82 63 | 23% 22% 25% | 6 3 3 | 9 5 4 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.13 1.30 | 289 312 272 | 79 45 34 | / 61 27 34 / | 25 17 8 | +18 +18 0 | 83% 90% 75% | 180 198 161 | 20% 21% 19% | 19 10 9 | 2 0 2 | +17 +10 +7 | |
|
1.37 1.01 1.19 | 229 244 212 | 65 36 29 | / 50 21 29 / | 19 10 9 | +15 +15 0 | 76% 83% 70% | 129 137 122 | 24% 17% 33% | 11 5 6 | 6 5 1 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
1.03 0.99 1.01 | 205 198 215 | 56 29 27 | / 54 24 30 / | 29 14 15 | +2 +5 -3 | 76% 78% 75% | 141 130 152 | 19% 15% 23% | 9 4 5 | 13 8 5 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
1.01 0.99 1.00 | 192 190 188 | 51 26 25 | / 51 24 27 / | 21 14 7 | 0 +2 -2 | 79% 83% 75% | 121 124 118 | 21% 19% 22% | 6 5 1 | 4 2 2 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.86 0.95 0.91 | 174 171 178 | 51 24 27 | / 54 27 27 / | 28 17 11 | -3 -3 0 | 83% 85% 80% | 113 117 109 | 15% 19% 12% | 5 1 4 | 5 0 5 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 0.94 1.05 | 201 206 186 | 55 30 25 | / 53 23 30 / | 21 16 5 | +2 +7 -5 | 68% 75% 60% | 128 136 120 | 28% 25% 31% | 1 1 0 | 5 1 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
1.04 1.06 1.05 | 229 215 237 | 65 31 34 | / 61 29 32 / | 21 15 6 | +4 +2 +2 | 74% 85% 63% | 137 139 136 | 29% 25% 32% | 5 0 5 | 7 2 5 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.19 0.64 0.92 | 202 259 143 | 52 36 16 | / 62 30 32 / | 25 13 12 | -10 +6 -16 | 75% 83% 68% | 137 168 107 | 23% 23% 23% | 6 4 2 | 10 4 6 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.84 0.85 0.84 | 181 177 193 | 52 26 26 | / 61 30 31 / | 10 7 3 | -9 -4 -5 | 63% 65% 60% | 120 112 128 | 21% 20% 21% | 7 3 4 | 9 6 3 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.74 0.69 | 175 178 172 | 45 24 21 | / 65 31 34 / | 18 9 9 | -20 -7 -13 | 69% 70% 68% | 104 95 112 | 24% 22% 27% | 11 7 4 | 19 12 7 | -8 -5 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 1.87 1.31 | 323 357 291 | 33 19 14 | / 19 8 11 / | 13 9 4 | +14 +11 +3 | 93% 100% 87% | 197 201 193 | 19% 16% 22% | 8 4 4 | 1 0 1 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
1.20 1.33 1.07 | 195 225 166 | 20 12 8 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +6 0 | 87% 93% 80% | 113 105 121 | 23% 13% 40% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.03 1.00 1.06 | 155 152 158 | 18 8 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 10 8 2 | +2 0 +2 | 83% 87% 80% | 96 96 96 | 11% 19% 5% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.93 0.99 0.86 | 162 177 147 | 16 9 7 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 3 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 83% 87% 80% | 91 85 97 | 14% 7% 21% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.93 0.62 1.23 | 231 177 286 | 23 10 13 | / 21 10 11 / | 8 2 6 | +2 0 +2 | 67% 53% 80% | 149 111 187 | 18% 12% 24% | 4 2 2 | 6 5 1 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 1.22 0.89 | 134 144 124 | 15 7 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 7 0 | 0 +1 -1 | 60% 73% 47% | 85 100 71 | 21% 17% 26% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.99 0.86 1.11 | 216 200 233 | 23 12 11 | / 24 12 12 / | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | 63% 53% 73% | 131 121 141 | 24% 16% 33% | 5 2 3 | 5 4 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.86 0.95 0.76 | 176 160 194 | 17 9 8 | / 22 9 13 / | 10 5 5 | -5 0 -5 | 73% 80% 67% | 115 107 123 | 19% 18% 19% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.89 0.55 | 173 234 114 | 15 11 4 | / 23 12 11 / | 8 5 3 | -8 -1 -7 | 63% 80% 47% | 128 169 87 | 15% 15% 16% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.63 0.61 | 160 143 179 | 17 8 9 | / 26 13 13 / | 9 6 3 | -9 -5 -4 | 60% 73% 47% | 91 90 92 | 32% 18% 56% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.71 0.98 | 234 242 228 | 20 11 9 | / 13 4 9 / | 7 2 5 | +7 +7 0 | 71% 75% 67% | 136 163 109 | 29% 36% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.20 1.40 1.00 | 277 322 234 | 22 13 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 4 4 0 | +2 +3 -1 | 75% 83% 67% | 176 228 124 | 28% 32% 19% | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.08 0.95 1.22 | 250 222 280 | 20 9 11 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 3 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 71% 75% 67% | 166 150 182 | 27% 23% 30% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.87 0.96 0.78 | 208 209 207 | 17 9 8 | / 19 8 11 / | 9 5 4 | -2 +1 -3 | 79% 92% 67% | 153 146 160 | 23% 21% 26% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.47 0.43 0.51 | 107 109 106 | 10 5 5 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 2 2 | -8 -4 -4 | 79% 83% 75% | 70 83 58 | 16% 15% 17% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.75 1.11 | 261 316 207 | 24 15 9 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 2 2 | +9 +9 0 | 83% 100% 67% | 167 203 131 | 29% 31% 26% | 3 0 3 | 2 0 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.15 1.09 1.21 | 252 233 271 | 20 10 10 | / 20 9 11 / | 7 3 4 | 0 +1 -1 | 75% 75% 75% | 172 159 185 | 30% 25% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.02 1.29 0.76 | 200 262 139 | 16 11 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 5 5 | -1 +3 -4 | 88% 92% 83% | 123 147 99 | 27% 18% 44% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.74 0.50 0.99 | 223 231 216 | 18 9 9 | / 21 11 10 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | 67% 58% 75% | 124 95 153 | 32% 26% 37% | 5 4 1 | 7 5 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.67 0.71 0.63 | 124 113 135 | 10 4 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 5 0 | -6 -4 -2 | 75% 83% 67% | 88 81 95 | 12% 13% 12% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
I think only Liquid have chance of win with Sentinels, fnatic is great team, but they dont have this extra firepower like ScreaM and Jamppi, fnatic have better strategies and better teamplay but they dont have something what liquid and sentinels have, TenZ can win alone map same with ScreaM and Jamppi, thats why i think if it will be fnatic vs sentinels its ez game for sentinels but with liquid it can be great match. What u think guys? Dont hate thats my opinion.
What people don't understand is that Na's teams are playing like teams in Europe but they have been playing this style for a few weeks so they don't even have a chance against the king of Europe TL, what happened against V1 was a mistake terrible they prepared to play against a NA team not against a poorly made copy of a EU team
So what advantage does Sentinels get for coming from the upper bracket? I'm going to assume it's getting to pick the first 2 maps, which is okay tbh. I think giving a map advantage or bracket reset is TOO good of an advantage over the opponents, but they can't have nothing. Bracket reset would work IF this final was Bo3, but Bo5 is too long.
after seeing this tournament, it seems SEN and FNC are on a different level than the other teams in the tournament. they’ve both dominated (except for FNC against SEN) and since SEN beat FNC i had no doubt they were making it to this game. if one of these teams ran into any other in the GF, it would be a stomping. glad these two teams could meet so we see a great match. SEN 3-1 FNC
i dont doubt FNC can improve, but it's only been few days since their last lost to SEN (which was a convincing lost). For FNC to win, FNC need a lot more time than a few days to catch up to SEN. Unless SEN collectively have a very off day (and I mean very bad like losing 80% of gunfights), I dont see FNC taking a single map
They're both far ahead of the others in this tourney for sure. I mean the only team Fnatic dropped a map to was to Nuturn(apart from Sentinels), and that's straight after 2-0'ing Liquid.
Fnatic and Sentinels are closely matched, but Sentinels is clearly just better overall, teamwork, tactics, micro game, it's just better right now. It's definitely the cumulative experience coming in and being able to close out these maps without making mistakes and forcing them out of the opponent.
Sentinels' midround tactics are much better, than Fnatics. Fnatic falls apart when they don't have the read, Sentinels thrives. I think Fnatic wins tactically in fakes and getting their opponents into poor positions, but Sentinels doesn't allow that to happen every round, which is why I think they are better. I think Sentinels are a step ahead most times.
I feel like Sentinels and Fnatic are surprisingly even in terms of their level as teams, but Sentinels has a lot more experience and a better mental than Fnatic hence have the upper edge in terms of closing out maps. In every single map these 2 teams have played it has went into OT or 13-10 / 13-11.