If SEN doesn't get knocked to the lower brackets then this is SEN vs ENVY or 100T vs ENVY
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.19 1.40 | 231 204 258 | 18 8 10 | / 14 8 6 / | 10 4 6 | +4 0 +4 | 79% 67% 92% | 147 134 160 | 24% 23% 26% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.12 0.82 1.41 | 244 221 268 | 19 8 11 | / 16 9 7 / | 7 2 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 71% 50% 92% | 133 99 167 | 13% 17% 11% | 5 1 4 | 2 2 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
1.10 0.50 1.70 | 230 154 306 | 19 5 14 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 3 4 | +3 -5 +8 | 79% 58% 100% | 160 112 208 | 22% 23% 22% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.96 1.22 0.70 | 207 278 137 | 17 11 6 | / 17 9 8 / | 11 4 7 | 0 +2 -2 | 71% 75% 67% | 125 165 84 | 14% 20% 7% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.44 1.40 | 220 133 308 | 20 6 14 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 2 6 | +3 -4 +7 | 79% 67% 92% | 126 67 184 | 19% 20% 19% | 5 3 2 | 3 2 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.19 1.40 | 222 204 241 | 16 8 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 14 6 8 | 0 -1 +1 | 71% 67% 75% | 170 153 188 | 24% 23% 26% | 3 0 3 | 3 3 0 | 0 -3 +3 | |
|
1.10 1.23 0.98 | 291 327 256 | 23 12 11 | / 22 12 10 / | 5 2 3 | +1 0 +1 | 71% 75% 67% | 182 196 168 | 20% 23% 18% | 3 2 1 | 5 2 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.93 0.46 1.39 | 154 138 170 | 12 4 8 | / 17 12 5 / | 8 3 5 | -5 -8 +3 | 67% 50% 83% | 123 119 127 | 22% 12% 35% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.90 0.26 1.54 | 169 80 259 | 15 3 12 | / 18 11 7 / | 5 2 3 | -3 -8 +5 | 54% 33% 75% | 96 59 134 | 6% 13% 4% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.56 0.56 0.55 | 155 152 159 | 14 7 7 | / 20 11 9 / | 2 0 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 81 88 74 | 21% 26% 16% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 0.94 1.08 | 228 265 182 | 44 28 16 | / 43 25 18 / | 27 11 16 | +1 +3 -2 | 79% 77% 81% | 132 146 114 | 19% 22% 15% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.70 1.28 0.97 | 199 168 254 | 44 19 25 | / 42 25 17 / | 18 7 11 | +2 -6 +8 | 75% 68% 85% | 122 94 155 | 21% 17% 24% | 8 4 4 | 3 2 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.77 1.15 0.94 | 189 166 239 | 38 16 22 | / 42 24 18 / | 17 9 8 | -4 -8 +4 | 77% 65% 92% | 135 117 157 | 23% 26% 20% | 3 0 3 | 3 2 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.63 1.28 0.92 | 210 189 254 | 42 18 24 | / 42 26 16 / | 12 5 7 | 0 -8 +8 | 61% 48% 77% | 133 107 165 | 16% 21% 12% | 9 4 5 | 12 10 2 | -3 -6 +3 | |
|
0.95 0.84 0.89 | 184 193 191 | 37 21 16 | / 41 24 17 / | 14 6 8 | -4 -3 -1 | 72% 71% 73% | 118 122 113 | 19% 20% 15% | 4 1 3 | 8 3 5 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.24 1.33 | 242 228 241 | 45 22 23 | / 34 15 19 / | 28 11 17 | +11 +7 +4 | 74% 73% 74% | 153 146 160 | 27% 30% 24% | 5 1 4 | 5 3 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.64 1.54 1.13 | 211 138 255 | 43 11 32 | / 37 22 15 / | 12 7 5 | +6 -11 +17 | 72% 58% 84% | 120 90 146 | 16% 25% 13% | 5 1 4 | 3 3 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.04 1.14 1.09 | 302 297 296 | 54 24 30 | / 52 25 27 / | 19 5 14 | +2 -1 +3 | 77% 69% 84% | 179 163 193 | 19% 25% 16% | 14 7 7 | 9 5 4 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.94 1.20 1.08 | 228 219 213 | 43 19 24 | / 40 22 18 / | 16 5 11 | +3 -3 +6 | 72% 62% 81% | 140 138 141 | 21% 22% 20% | 4 1 3 | 7 4 3 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.52 0.63 0.58 | 121 110 139 | 25 10 15 | / 42 20 22 / | 11 3 8 | -17 -10 -7 | 68% 69% 68% | 70 65 75 | 23% 24% 22% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.82 0.91 0.29 | 229 245 140 | 11 10 1 | / 15 13 2 / | 2 1 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 71% 67% 100% | 147 160 68 | 26% 24% 50% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.55 0.67 0.02 | 142 158 50 | 7 7 0 | / 13 11 2 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -4 -2 | 71% 75% 50% | 77 89 | 13% 13% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.49 0.51 0.36 | 119 114 153 | 5 4 1 | / 13 11 2 / | 3 2 1 | -8 -7 -1 | 64% 58% 100% | 79 88 30 | 25% 27% 0% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.40 0.37 0.54 | 127 117 188 | 5 4 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 3 3 0 | -9 -8 -1 | 50% 50% 50% | 77 79 65 | 7% 9% 0% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.20 0.22 0.08 | 141 148 105 | 6 5 1 | / 15 13 2 / | 2 2 0 | -9 -8 -1 | 36% 33% 50% | 96 101 68 | 26% 24% 50% | 1 1 0 | 8 7 1 | -7 -6 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.01 1.16 2.15 | 287 140 312 | 18 1 17 | / 4 1 3 / | 2 1 1 | +14 0 +14 | 100% 100% 100% | 168 81 183 | 15% 0% 17% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.88 2.52 1.77 | 308 254 318 | 15 2 13 | / 5 0 5 / | 13 4 9 | +10 +2 +8 | 100% 100% 100% | 189 78 207 | 24% 25% 24% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.42 1.78 1.36 | 299 469 272 | 16 4 12 | / 8 2 6 / | 5 0 5 | +8 +2 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 163 117 170 | 12% 14% 12% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.34 1.28 1.36 | 358 469 340 | 16 3 13 | / 11 1 10 / | 11 1 10 | +5 +2 +3 | 93% 50% 100% | 197 11 228 | 20% 100% 18% | 6 1 5 | 2 1 1 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
0.92 0.99 0.90 | 111 22 126 | 5 0 5 | / 6 0 6 / | 6 1 5 | -1 -1 | 79% 100% 75% | 79 0 92 | 38% 38% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.70 1.29 | 249 316 211 | 19 9 10 | / 11 3 8 / | 7 2 5 | +8 +6 +2 | 89% 100% 83% | 149 163 141 | 33% 24% 41% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.41 1.61 1.29 | 249 276 234 | 16 7 9 | / 11 3 8 / | 14 6 8 | +5 +4 +1 | 95% 100% 92% | 129 91 151 | 21% 23% 21% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.22 1.00 1.35 | 244 207 266 | 17 5 12 | / 11 4 7 / | 3 1 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 68% 71% 67% | 161 132 178 | 15% 24% 12% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.08 1.67 0.73 | 219 277 186 | 14 7 7 | / 13 3 10 / | 7 4 3 | +1 +4 -3 | 84% 86% 83% | 145 176 126 | 22% 29% 19% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.64 1.03 0.41 | 180 235 148 | 12 6 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 3 1 2 | -2 +1 -3 | 63% 71% 58% | 112 158 84 | 14% 27% 0% | 1 0 1 | 6 1 5 | -5 -1 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.03 1.28 0.60 | 231 257 186 | 15 11 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 2 1 | 0 +3 -3 | 63% 67% 57% | 144 161 115 | 28% 34% 18% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.97 1.49 0.07 | 197 248 110 | 14 12 2 | / 13 6 7 / | 1 1 0 | +1 +6 -5 | 58% 75% 29% | 106 151 30 | 37% 40% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.89 0.80 1.05 | 256 238 289 | 15 9 6 | / 19 12 7 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 74% 67% 86% | 162 154 176 | 17% 23% 11% | 5 4 1 | 2 2 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.94 0.49 | 178 195 150 | 10 7 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 4 1 | -5 -3 -2 | 74% 75% 71% | 116 123 103 | 36% 47% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.37 0.40 0.30 | 97 82 124 | 6 3 3 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 2 1 | -10 -6 -4 | 63% 67% 57% | 51 53 47 | 14% 20% 9% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
Exactly not saying SEN doesn't lose but when it matters most NA teams just choke in high pressure. Games become super one sided sometimes and its boring to watch. I thought 100T was similar to SEN but in the end I see that it hasn't changed. I hope C9 proves me wrong and at least be competitive. I see EU games and they're super close till last moment.
I think my eyes need medical attention rn. I dont know why it is so bad. I mean not individually, they are all great players and I would definetely enjoy watching frag movie from that game. But utility, composition, team coordination is just nowhere to be found.
Its really feels like Im watching multi-stream from random radiant game
When SEN lose a map, they always lose big. I think they just give up once they know they are losing for certain and just hide their strat, and move mentally quickly to the next game. Trust me when I say SEN will now wipe C9 on Icebox now since their mental is reset during the Split game, not after.
edit: told y'all LMAO
I don't think any region will necessarily destroy the other, it's gonna come down to matchups ultimately. Where I think SEN can benefit is 1) they will have a lot of VOD on their opponents who also had to go through Challengers in other regions and 2) they don't have a recognizable style of play they absolutely try to stick to. Take the 13-1 on Split, ShahZam just said in the interview that they already feel like they have the answer to crack the defense the next time they play C9. I wouldn't be shocked to see completely different agent lineups from them in Iceland as they constantly are reinventing themselves.
The thing is, SEN doesn't change lineup-wise often, in this tournament for example, they've run the same comp on every map they've played, which makes sense, because the tournament is so short. But in general this holds true for all other tournaments, except challengers 2. The main reason for those changes aren't really fundamental beyond the macro switch to the Viper/Astra. Zombs is carrying them hard in this regard, playing both the Astra and the Viper(dapr picks it up for bind).
They change their playstyle and timings. The way they read and dismantle teams are largely in that realm. That's why I think EU should be worried on one part. But on the other hand, this is true for pretty much every EU team; watching VOD's and figuring the opponent out, antistratting etc...
Generally whenever regions clash in a new esport, it's rarely very close. Some regions may get pumped up, because they only play amongst themselves and get exposed in internationals. I feel like this was the case for Turkey in EMEA and could be the case for NA in Iceland. But you never know, Sentinels look good and they could just literally be better, than Liquid/Fnatic.
Sentinels wins Haven with some kinda-lucky cluthes.
Gets destroyed on the second map.
Wins the third.
But what if Shahzam could not clutch at 11-11 and they lost Haven, and they got demolished on the second map? This could have been very heartbreaking, and could have happened against 100T.
I think SEN is in a really good point right now, everybody on the team pops off. But they need to fix those problems that they have(I don't know what it is actually) to survive at masters event.