Nobody yet? I like IMT to 2-0. Better form as of late
Added Astra
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
244 126 | 21 11 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 8 2 6 | +2 +2 0 | 140 69 | 25% 41% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
237 109 | 20 10 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 4 1 | +1 +1 0 | 144 58 | 17% 16% 19% | 2 0 2 | 5 1 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
181 120 | 15 5 10 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -5 +2 | 112 77 | 17% 20% 15% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
172 78 | 11 6 5 | / 18 9 9 / | 10 6 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 135 58 | 34% 34% 33% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
147 74 | 12 6 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 4 5 | -6 -2 -4 | 93 47 | 52% 50% 54% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
412 220 | 34 20 14 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 3 5 | +16 +11 +5 | 230 100 | 24% 30% 19% | 7 3 4 | 0 0 0 | +7 +3 +4 | |||
|
216 142 | 19 6 13 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 4 1 | +3 -4 +7 | 133 79 | 10% 9% 11% | 2 0 2 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -2 +3 | |||
|
206 100 | 17 9 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 2 6 | 0 +1 -1 | 137 66 | 30% 41% 20% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
146 69 | 11 6 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -2 -1 | 95 44 | 19% 21% 17% | 3 3 0 | 1 0 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |||
|
145 72 | 11 6 5 | / 14 6 8 / | 9 3 6 | -3 0 -3 | 105 50 | 18% 35% 8% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
246 121 | 62 33 29 | / 52 23 29 / | 16 7 9 | +10 +10 0 | 148 72 | 23% 30% 16% | 9 3 6 | 10 4 6 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
203 130 | 51 23 28 | / 42 22 20 / | 16 6 10 | +9 +1 +8 | 115 68 | 19% 31% 13% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
199 109 | 45 20 25 | / 53 25 28 / | 21 12 9 | -8 -5 -3 | 142 78 | 27% 26% 29% | 8 3 5 | 9 4 5 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
186 105 | 44 18 26 | / 43 20 23 / | 21 13 8 | +1 -2 +3 | 114 60 | 21% 21% 21% | 5 1 4 | 9 2 7 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
184 85 | 41 23 18 | / 51 24 27 / | 28 14 14 | -10 -1 -9 | 116 55 | 48% 54% 43% | 5 4 1 | 5 3 2 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
270 139 | 65 39 26 | / 52 26 26 / | 22 10 12 | +13 +13 0 | 179 78 | 24% 22% 25% | 12 7 5 | 3 3 0 | +9 +4 +5 | |||
|
251 114 | 59 31 28 | / 51 27 24 / | 16 8 8 | +8 +4 +4 | 154 67 | 37% 34% 40% | 10 4 6 | 9 5 4 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
209 103 | 48 24 24 | / 50 28 22 / | 21 15 6 | -2 -4 +2 | 130 63 | 11% 13% 8% | 5 0 5 | 7 5 2 | -2 -5 +3 | |||
|
158 89 | 35 18 17 | / 46 23 23 / | 28 15 13 | -11 -5 -6 | 121 71 | 22% 28% 18% | 4 3 1 | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
144 80 | 34 17 17 | / 45 23 22 / | 17 6 11 | -11 -6 -5 | 83 38 | 18% 24% 13% | 7 4 3 | 8 1 7 | -1 +3 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
272 107 | 22 14 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 4 0 | +7 +8 -1 | 172 78 | 25% 30% 18% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
264 177 | 20 7 13 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 2 3 | +3 0 +3 | 184 126 | 26% 20% 32% | 5 1 4 | 2 2 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |||
|
171 92 | 13 6 7 | / 10 3 7 / | 8 6 2 | +3 +3 0 | 111 62 | 27% 29% 26% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
169 106 | 11 4 7 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 8 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 115 73 | 39% 50% 32% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
163 126 | 13 8 5 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 1 3 | -1 +2 -3 | 74 44 | 19% 36% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
272 122 | 20 12 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 9 5 4 | +3 +4 -1 | 170 83 | 11% 15% 7% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
230 94 | 17 10 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +1 0 | 128 45 | 55% 59% 45% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
191 70 | 15 10 5 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 4 3 | 0 +2 -2 | 172 50 | 26% 18% 50% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
145 62 | 11 8 3 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 5 3 | -6 0 -6 | 97 40 | 25% 38% 16% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
132 69 | 10 5 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 63 22 | 16% 23% 7% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
266 142 | 23 10 13 | / 10 6 4 / | 5 2 3 | +13 +4 +9 | 159 81 | 22% 40% 13% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
236 78 | 18 13 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 2 7 | +2 +5 -3 | 139 46 | 56% 59% 50% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
223 129 | 19 8 11 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 1 3 | +1 0 +1 | 132 70 | 18% 22% 15% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
162 76 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 6 4 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 111 54 | 21% 22% 21% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
149 113 | 11 2 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -6 +3 | 86 61 | 24% 33% 20% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
316 147 | 25 12 13 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | +7 +2 +5 | 197 89 | 33% 20% 58% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
208 121 | 16 9 7 | / 19 9 10 / | 7 3 4 | -3 0 -3 | 133 83 | 20% 14% 25% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
185 131 | 13 4 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 11 7 4 | -2 -5 +3 | 161 124 | 26% 7% 38% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
153 102 | 13 6 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -2 -1 | 89 49 | 19% 29% 13% | 2 0 2 | 3 0 3 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
138 45 | 9 6 3 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 6 1 | -8 -4 -4 | 88 27 | 11% 14% 6% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
I'm really not sure on this one.
I think IMT have looked better so far in Masters, But LG had no idea what to expect from SEN's new line-up. When LG play IMT, they will be far more prepared.
I thought IMT might have the advantage over 100T, and they sure gave them a run of it - whereas LG totally fluffed their last encounter with 100T. It was a bloodbath.
On average, LG hit more headies & have a better K/D than IMT.
IMT, on the other hand, do more damage per round, get more kills per round, more first bloods, and have a better entry success rate.
Neither team have been performing up to standard over their past 5 games, with players on both sides unable to reach their full potential, but LG have slipped a little further.
Over the past 5 games, IMT look better on ATK while LG look better on DEF.
IMT are having more overall success on map win %. And, if we see Ascent, Icebox & Bind played in this series, IMT have the advantage on Bind, with LG looking stronger on Icebox.
Ascent could be a real decider. Both teams are great. IMT perhaps a little more so.
I think the advantage goes to IMT but we will have to wait and see. Deep down, I want LG to move on through masters, and they sure could. It kind of depends on who is feeling cracked today.
This just proves that LG is one of the best teams in NA when it comes to firepower. I watched the game on and off while doing some other things but Thief and aproto combined for a -18 and LG beat IMT... Normally everyone is talking about Thief and aproto but dre, stellar and moose can pop off on any given day and carry this team to a win. Also jcStani is probably the most underrated player in NA. Stani is so damn good