predicting 100t v sen where it goes 2-1 and the team which wins the OT on the first map wins the match
Added Astra
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
344 337 | 19 3 16 | / 5 0 5 / | 8 2 6 | +14 +3 +11 | 193 191 | 30% 0% 31% | 4 0 4 | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
285 280 | 15 2 13 | / 10 2 8 / | 5 1 4 | +5 0 +5 | 149 144 | 18% 0% 18% | 5 1 4 | 1 2 -1 | +4 -1 +5 | |||
|
222 149 | 14 5 9 | / 4 1 3 / | 3 0 3 | +10 +4 +6 | 133 97 | 27% 63% 16% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
202 144 | 12 3 9 | / 7 2 5 / | 4 1 3 | +5 +1 +4 | 122 87 | 9% 12% 8% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
184 159 | 9 2 7 | / 9 1 8 / | 7 2 5 | 0 +1 -1 | 115 95 | 13% 9% 15% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
184 33 | 10 8 2 | / 13 10 3 / | 1 0 1 | -3 -2 -1 | 110 13 | 40% 44% 25% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
184 48 | 8 6 2 | / 13 10 3 / | 0 0 0 | -5 -4 -1 | 129 38 | 32% 38% 20% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
152 23 | 7 6 1 | / 15 12 3 / | 2 2 0 | -8 -6 -2 | 109 14 | 34% 33% 38% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
131 30 | 5 4 1 | / 13 10 3 / | 3 3 0 | -8 -6 -2 | 77 | 31% 31% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
122 5 | 5 5 0 | / 15 12 3 / | 5 4 1 | -10 -7 -3 | 92 5 | 22% 28% 0% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
290 204 | 43 13 30 | / 25 9 16 / | 13 4 9 | +18 +4 +14 | 152 111 | 30% 26% 32% | 10 2 8 | 5 2 3 | +5 0 +5 | |||
|
261 182 | 40 14 26 | / 26 9 17 / | 8 2 6 | +14 +5 +9 | 132 91 | 18% 19% 18% | 11 4 7 | 3 3 0 | +8 +1 +7 | |||
|
222 117 | 35 18 17 | / 20 8 12 / | 11 2 9 | +15 +10 +5 | 140 74 | 21% 27% 15% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
185 112 | 29 9 20 | / 26 11 15 / | 13 8 5 | +3 -2 +5 | 118 74 | 12% 15% 11% | 5 2 3 | 4 1 3 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
174 92 | 27 14 13 | / 27 8 19 / | 13 3 10 | 0 +6 -6 | 108 58 | 22% 27% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 3 -1 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
215 111 | 37 19 18 | / 33 19 14 / | 3 3 0 | +4 0 +4 | 148 69 | 34% 32% 38% | 6 2 4 | 4 3 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |||
|
172 44 | 24 18 6 | / 37 22 15 / | 9 6 3 | -13 -4 -9 | 109 25 | 19% 22% 13% | 7 3 4 | 5 2 3 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
149 56 | 22 14 8 | / 39 24 15 / | 7 5 2 | -17 -10 -7 | 106 37 | 27% 29% 23% | 3 2 1 | 12 3 9 | -9 -1 -8 | |||
|
146 57 | 21 15 6 | / 35 23 12 / | 13 10 3 | -14 -8 -6 | 110 43 | 26% 24% 29% | 1 1 0 | 6 2 4 | -5 -1 -4 | |||
|
134 49 | 20 13 7 | / 30 18 12 / | 7 6 1 | -10 -5 -5 | 88 30 | 25% 25% 25% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
236 134 | 25 12 13 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | +9 +5 +4 | 124 65 | 19% 20% 18% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |||
|
235 138 | 24 10 14 | / 20 9 11 / | 5 2 3 | +4 +1 +3 | 132 71 | 31% 28% 33% | 6 2 4 | 3 2 1 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
222 101 | 21 13 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 8 2 6 | +5 +6 -1 | 144 63 | 18% 20% 15% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
167 96 | 17 6 11 | / 19 9 10 / | 9 7 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 116 67 | 14% 16% 12% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
163 59 | 18 12 6 | / 18 7 11 / | 6 1 5 | 0 +5 -5 | 105 40 | 29% 33% 21% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
246 142 | 29 13 16 | / 20 9 11 / | 3 3 0 | +9 +4 +5 | 157 84 | 35% 27% 45% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
170 82 | 16 10 6 | / 20 11 9 / | 8 6 2 | -4 -1 -3 | 118 62 | 28% 21% 35% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
160 49 | 14 10 4 | / 24 12 12 / | 8 6 2 | -10 -2 -8 | 108 31 | 13% 14% 11% | 6 2 4 | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
146 72 | 15 8 7 | / 24 12 12 / | 5 3 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 104 49 | 23% 26% 19% | 2 2 0 | 7 2 5 | -5 0 -5 | |||
|
136 58 | 15 9 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 3 1 | -2 +1 -3 | 94 44 | 23% 21% 25% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
The last time these two faced, there were two different players on both sides. In addition, both teams have stark stylistic changes. I'd be surprised if the result was that SEN-favored as last time, but I don't think I would go as far as to predict 100T 2-0. I think 100T and SEN both have a lot to work on. In my opinion, like a lot of 100T's games, it will come down to Asuna's ability to click heads in crunch time. 100T are always on top when Asuna's on top. If we get the Asuna that played against LG last week this is 2-0 100T all day. If it's the same Asuna as against IMT, both maps will be close but 2-0 SEN.
2-1 100T. With TenZ, Sen has the most talented in NA but I think steel and 100T will have a much better gameplan against Sen than LG had. 100T is a more strategic team than LG, whereas LG relies heavily on just winning duels, so I think 100T should be better against a team with as little practice as Sen has. With that being said, TenZ has now had some more practice with the team and they are going to have better chemistry in this game then they had against LG so I think this is a 2-1 for 100T.
Showed how stereotyped 100T is, again.
100T might be smarter than Sentinels in stratregic way like utilizing agent's ability. But their problem is they really don't have thought on how to counter their enemies. I would call it fluidness. And in that way Sentinels is kinda natural enemy for them cause Sentinels' strength is fluidness.
Almost every round went into Sentinels' favorite way cause 100T is too typical. Especially Steel is red like a booklet cause it is too quick to read. Only one good thing is that Ethan can frag, not just like autimatic who is still trying to play csgo in valorant.